From HTTP Long Connections to WebSockets: The Technological Evolution of Real-Time Web and U.S. Enterprise Practices

I. Historical Evolution: Dilemmas and Breakthroughs in HTTP Connection Modes

The early Web was dominated by static content, and the HTTP protocol adopted a "request-response" short-connection mode: after the client sends a request and the server returns a response, the TCP connection is closed immediately. This mode worked in the era of static pages, but with the rise of interactive needs such as online chat and real-time monitoring, the drawbacks of short connections became prominent—each interaction required re-establishing a TCP connection (via a three-way handshake), and the server could not actively push data, relying only on "polling" or "long polling."

1.1 Attempts at HTTP Long Connections: Limitations of Keep-Alive

To address the connection overhead of short connections, HTTP/1.1 introduced the Keep-Alive mechanism (enabled by default): the client and server negotiate via the Connection: Keep-Alive header to reuse a single TCP connection for transmitting multiple HTTP requests/responses, reducing the number of connection establishments. However, Keep-Alive is essentially an extension of the "request-response" mode and has three core limitations:

• Passive response, no active push capability: The server can only return data after the client initiates a request. In real-time scenarios, the client must poll frequently (e.g., once per second), leading to bandwidth waste and data latency.
• Excessive header overhead: Each HTTP request must carry a complete header (e.g., Cookie, User-Agent). Even when transmitting a 1-byte chat message, the header may occupy hundreds of bytes, resulting in extremely low transmission efficiency.
• Connection serialization: Although HTTP/1.1 supports "Pipelining," most browsers and servers have poor compatibility. Requests over the same Keep-Alive connection still need to be processed serially, without parallel transmission.

These limitations made Keep-Alive unable to meet high real-time requirements, driving the development of the WebSocket protocol.

II. The WebSocket Protocol: Design Logic for Real-Time Communication

In 2011, WebSocket was standardized by the IETF as RFC 6455. Its core goal is to establish a persistent, full-duplex TCP communication channel between the client and server while being compatible with existing Web infrastructure (e.g., firewalls, proxies).

2.1 Core Design: Balancing Compatibility and Efficiency

WebSocket’s design skillfully balances "compatibility" and "efficiency," with key mechanisms including:

• HTTP handshake upgrade: When the client connects for the first time, it sends an HTTP request and uses the Upgrade: websocket and Connection: Upgrade headers to inform the server of a "protocol upgrade request." The server responds with a 101 Switching Protocols status code; after the handshake is completed, the TCP connection is "hijacked" into a persistent WebSocket connection. This design allows WebSocket to penetrate most firewalls (firewalls recognize the handshake request as a normal HTTP request and do not block it).
• Lightweight frame structure: After the handshake, data is transmitted in "frames." Each frame header is only 2–14 bytes (far smaller than an HTTP header) and contains two key fields:
  • Mask: Frames sent by the client must carry a 32-bit mask to prevent malicious data forgery and improve security.
  • Opcode: Distinguishes frame types (0x01 for text frames, 0x02 for binary frames, 0x08 for close frames), enabling flexible adaptation to different data scenarios and reducing parsing complexity.
• Full-duplex communication: Once the connection is established, the client and server can send data bidirectionally simultaneously, without waiting for the other party’s response (unlike HTTP’s "request-response" serial mode), with latency reduced to the millisecond level.

2.2 The Essence of Design: Resolving HTTP’s "Real-Time Paradox"

The core contradiction of HTTP lies in the conflict between its "request-driven" nature and "real-time requirements"—real-time scenarios require the server to actively push data, but HTTP does not allow the server to respond independently of a request. By adopting "one-time handshake, persistent connection, and full-duplex transmission," WebSocket breaks out of the HTTP framework and builds a real-time channel directly based on TCP. At the same time, it leverages HTTP handshakes to be compatible with existing networks, fundamentally resolving this contradiction.

III. Popular U.S. Frameworks and Libraries: WebSocket Implementation Toolchains

Implementing the WebSocket protocol is complex (requiring handling of handshakes, frame parsing, reconnections, etc.). The U.S. developer ecosystem has produced a range of mature tools to lower implementation barriers.

3.1 Frontend Framework: Socket.IO (Compatibility-First)

Developed by the U.S. team at Automattic, Socket.IO is the most popular frontend library. Its core advantage is automatic fallback compatibility: when a browser does not support WebSocket (e.g., older IE versions), it automatically falls back to technologies like long polling or SSE to ensure real-time communication availability. Additionally, it has built-in reconnection, room, and broadcasting features, making it suitable for scenarios such as group chat and online whiteboards. It is adopted by enterprises including Netflix and Uber.

3.2 Backend Libraries: Differentiation in Performance and Ecosystem

• ws (Node.js): A lightweight WebSocket library that only implements the core functions of RFC 6455, with no redundant dependencies and extremely high performance (supporting tens of thousands of messages per second). It is suitable for high-performance scenarios such as real-time log collection and is the first choice in the Node.js ecosystem.
• Netty (Java): A high-performance networking framework developed by the U.S. JBoss team, with built-in WebSocket support. Its asynchronous I/O model can handle millions of concurrent connections, making it suitable for low-latency scenarios such as financial market data push. It is used in enterprise-level applications by companies like Twitter and Alibaba.
• Django Channels (Python): Extends WebSocket capabilities for the Django framework, compatible with Django’s ORM and authentication system. It is suitable for rapid development of real-time scenarios such as voting systems and notification systems, and is used by Instagram and Pinterest to build internal tools.

The design logic of these tools revolves around "scenario adaptation": Socket.IO solves compatibility issues, ws/Netty prioritize performance, and Django Channels focus on ecosystem integration—providing "minimum-cost" solutions for different needs.

IV. U.S. Enterprise-Level Applications: Practical WebSocket Scenarios

WebSocket’s efficiency and real-time capabilities have made it a key technology for U.S. tech enterprises to solve core business needs. Typical cases include:

4.1 Real-Time Collaboration: Google Docs

Google Docs’ "multi-user real-time editing" relies on WebSocket: user modification operations (e.g., inserting characters) are encapsulated into binary frames and pushed to other collaborating users’ clients in real time via WebSocket. The client renders updates locally, with latency controlled within 100ms. With HTTP long polling, users would have to wait for polling intervals, significantly degrading the collaboration experience.

4.2 Enterprise Communication: Slack

As a leading U.S. enterprise IM tool, Slack needs to support tens of thousands of enterprises online simultaneously and ensure real-time message delivery. Its core communication layer is built on WebSocket: after a user sends a message, the client encapsulates the message into a text frame and transmits it to Slack’s servers. After verification, the server broadcasts the message to recipients via WebSocket, with latency below 50ms. Compared to polling, WebSocket reduces server requests by 90% and ensures no message loss via TCP connections.

4.3 Financial Monitoring: Bloomberg Terminal

The Bloomberg Terminal needs to push real-time market data (e.g., stocks, foreign exchange) with an update frequency of 10ms per time. Its underlying layer uses WebSocket: exchange data is transmitted to Bloomberg’s servers in real time, the server pushes structured market data (as binary frames) to terminal clients, and the client parses and updates the K-line chart. WebSocket’s low latency ensures traders receive market data immediately, avoiding trading losses caused by delays.

4.4 Cloud Monitoring: AWS CloudWatch

AWS CloudWatch needs to collect real-time metrics data (e.g., CPU usage) from resources such as EC2 and S3. It uses WebSocket to implement "real-time monitoring streams": cloud resources report metrics to the server, which pushes the data to users’ monitoring dashboards via WebSocket. Users can view real-time metrics without refreshing the page. With HTTP long connections, monitoring latency would reach the second level, failing to meet the real-time alert needs of high-availability scenarios.

V. Conclusion: The Evolution Logic of Real-Time Web

The transition from HTTP short connections to Keep-Alive, and then to WebSocket, reflects a process of "technology evolving with needs": short connections worked in the static Web era; as real-time needs emerged, Keep-Alive was limited by the request-response model; WebSocket, by breaking out of the HTTP framework and building a full-duplex channel based on TCP, fundamentally solved real-time challenges.

U.S. frameworks and libraries have lowered the implementation threshold for WebSocket, and enterprise applications such as Slack and Google Docs have verified its value. In the future, WebSocket may integrate with HTTP/3 (QUIC protocol) to further improve efficiency, but its core design philosophy of "persistence, full-duplex, and low overhead" will continue.

Leapcell: The Best of Serverless Web Hosting

Finally, I recommend the best platform for deploying Python services: Leapcell

🚀 Build with Your Favorite Language

Develop effortlessly in JavaScript, Python, Go, or Rust.

🌍 Deploy Unlimited Projects for Free

Only pay for what you use—no requests, no charges.

⚡ Pay-as-You-Go, No Hidden Costs

No idle fees, just seamless scalability.

📖 Explore Our Documentation

🔹 Follow us on Twitter: @LeapcellHQ